Curse

callumevans324 · May 30, 2006, 12:29 AM // 00:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immortal Flame

This is a very good idea. Of course there would be leadership problems with two or more council members. For GvG, would guild rankings maintain for the original guilds or for the umbrella guild? And I don't think the umbrella name should be named after any guild in particular, since you'll end up with Unworldly Exotic Banished Red Blue Legionary Warriors and Mages of Tyria and the Universe as a Whole as your umbrella name

. But its a really good idea to at least have some organization to the many many small guilds running around.

I think that a good idea would be to decide on a council style too: DEmocoracy (with more than 1 leader), Monarchy/Dictatorship (1 Leader Only),Republic (1 leader but can be voted out every XXdays or wahtever) and so on, this would help keep the authority in check in a way that EVERYONE can enjoy.

Rikimaru · May 30, 2006, 01:00 AM // 01:00

This thread was created last year, the idea is the same as alliances. Was that bump a joke?

Tuoba Hturt Eht · May 30, 2006, 02:08 AM // 02:08

Well, a suggestion was made. Note the underlined bold text.

Quote:

Originally Posted by callumevans324

I think that a good idea would be to decide on a council style too: DEmocoracy (with more than 1 leader), Monarchy/Dictatorship (1 Leader Only),Republic (1 leader but can be voted out every XXdays or wahtever) and so on, this would help keep the authority in check in a way that EVERYONE can enjoy.

Personally, I like the current system, "Monarchy / Dictatorship (1 leader only).

It costs 1,000 gold to send an alliance invite to other guilds and if I spent that much gold inviting other guilds into our alliance, I would pretty much like to hold the title of "Alliance Leader".

Rwar.

Undivine · May 30, 2006, 09:21 AM // 09:21

I'm not sure exactly what the council would vote on.

I think this thread is moot, so can we just let it die?